Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | YEN Darren | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
2 | LAI Adam J. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
3 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | D D V D V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 3 | -2.0 |
3 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | D V V D D V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
5 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | MORREALE John | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
7 | SHI Andrew | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
8 | ESCUETA Tony V. | V V V D D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | TANN Justin | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
10 | LO Joshua H. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
11 | GANTA Vijay | V V D V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
12 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | D D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
13 | OSTER Keegan J. | D V D V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
14 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | V V D D D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
15 | HUANG Ethan F. | V D D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
16 | LUEBBE Macklan C | V D D D D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
17 | HOLZ William A. | V V V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
18 | GHOSH Tuhin | D V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
19 | GHENEA George Philipe | D V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
20 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
21 | FENG Leo | D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
22 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
23 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
24 | RAI Avin | V V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
25 | HO Kaden M. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
26 | XU William | V D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
27 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | D D V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
28 | BARNETT Adam | D D D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
29 | CZAHA Balint | D V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
30 | RESHEIDAT Malik | D V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
31 | MAKLIN Edward P. | D V V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
32 | LIN Daniel | V D D V D D | V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
33 | REYES Xavier M. | V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
34 | BREIER Satchel E. | V V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
35 | HONG Vincent Q. | D V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
36 | YUN Jake | V V V V D V | D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
37 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | V V V V D D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
38 | KIM Shawn J. | V D D V V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
39 | MAGUIRE Matthew V. | V D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
39 | BRAR Sanjeet | V V D V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
41 | HOLMES Aiden G. | D V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
41 | WU Mengke | D V D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
43 | COVINGTON Max G. | D D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
44 | QUAN Nicholas | D V V D V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
45 | LEITH Jack | V D V V D V | D | 0.9 | 4 | +3.1 |
46 | SHASHA zane | V V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
47 | HARRIS Alex K. | V V V D V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
48 | CHANG Colin S. | D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
49 | XU Andrew | V D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
50 | LO Alexander | V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
51 | LU Caleb Q. | V V D D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
52 | COLE Alexander | V V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
53 | YAO Jonathan | V D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
54 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | V V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
55 | ATEFI Daniel | V D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
56 | ZHOU Brian | D V D V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
57 | CHOI Silas | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
58 | LIU kelly | V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
59 | HAN Daniel Y. | D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
60 | STONE Esmond A. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
61 | MICHELL Bailey | D V D D V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
62 | CHEONG Heonjae | D V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
63 | KOKKIN Jack S. | V D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
64 | NG Jeremiah | D D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
65 | XUE ALEXANDER | D V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
66 | LEVIN Mark A. | D V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
67 | GAFFNEY John M. | D D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
68 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | D D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
69 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | D D D V D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
70 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | D D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
71 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D V V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
72 | YEN Preston | D D D V D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
73 | OH Triton | D V D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
74 | MURZYN III CJ | D D D V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
75 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | D D D D V | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
76 | LI Joshua L. | D D D V D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
77 | ALTIRS Alexander | V D D D D D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 | |
78 | ZHENG Edward L. | V D D D D D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
79 | CHENG Albert | D D D V D D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
80 | DENG Andrew | D D V D D D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
81 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | V D D D D D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
82 | SATHE Tej R. | D D D D V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
83 | FALLICK Ozzie | D D D D V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 | |
84 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | D D D D V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
85 | CHEN Evan P. | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
86 | DILLREE Spencer S. | D D D D D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 | |
87 | BIRKS Evan D. | D D D D D D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.