Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
2 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | |
3 | KONG Olivia | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
3 | KOKES Gabrielle | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
5 | CHO Gracie L. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
6 | LI Grace Q. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 24% |
7 | LI Phoebe J. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
8 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
9 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
10 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
11 | KHOO Lauren A. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | |
12 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | |
13 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
14 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
15 | CHO Taylor S. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
16 | ATLURI Srija | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
17 | LI Rachel Y. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | |
18 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
19 | EYER Hailey M. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
20 | LEE Paulina | - | 1% | 5% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 13% |
21 | KOROL Neta | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
22 | WU Julianna Y. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
23 | GU EMILY | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | DEBACK Greta I. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
25 | JANG Kimberley | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
26 | SUN Ruoxi | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
27 | YU Lauren C. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
28 | WU Kyra | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
29 | WONG Sophia M. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
30 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
31 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | RENTON Samantha | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
33 | REN Olivia Y. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
34 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 8% |
35 | HALL Velma | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
36 | SENIC Adeline | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
37 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% | |
38 | DU Hannah | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
39 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
40 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
41 | LI Meilin | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
42 | PROCOPIO Lucia | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
43 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
44 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
45 | BATRA Chaahat | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
46 | CHO Cameron S. | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
47 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
48 | BOLES Sophia | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
49 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
50 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
51 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
52 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
53 | HUANG NATALIE | 4% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 4% | - |
54 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
55 | XUE Alanna L. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
56 | TOLBERT Zoe | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | |
57 | SHIH Diane | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
58 | LIU Siyuan | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
59 | SEAL Julie T. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
60 | DUAN Konnie | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
61 | PERLMAN Talia | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
62 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
63 | LEE Ariana | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
64 | VOHRA Anusha | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | KOROL Dana | 1% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
66 | SUN Chien-Yu | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
67 | YE Eileen | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
68 | YEH Marissa E. | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
69 | TONG Ophelia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
70 | CHON Sydney | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
71 | YIN Helen | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
72 | HWANG Alison | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
73 | WU Irene M. | 6% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
74 | DING Abigail | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
75 | COKER Bettina M. | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
76 | POWERS Meredith R. | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
77 | MAO Rebecca J. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
78 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
79 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 89% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.