Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
2 | CHENG Ava | V V D D D V | V V V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
3 | LIN Katie Y. | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
3 | ISERT Sarah | D D V V D | V V V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
5 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
6 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | DAVIS Jessica L. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
8 | DONDISCH Sophia | V V D D V | V V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
9 | BEI Karen | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
10 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
11 | MCLANE Lauren | D V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
12 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
13 | COBERT Helen G. | V V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
14 | GABERKORN Nadia | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
15 | ROSS Naomi O. | D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
16 | NI Emma | D D D D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
17 | REID Anousheh | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
18 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
19 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | V D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
20 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
21 | LEUNG Natalie | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
22 | CHU Audrey | V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
23 | LIN Elaine | V V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
24 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
25 | MILEWSKI Nicole | D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
26 | SZEWC Alexandra | V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
27 | LEE Yedda | D V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
28 | PAN Michelle | D V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
29 | PRIMES Amanda M. | V V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
30 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
31 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | D V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
32 | LEANG Andrea K. | V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
33 | LIU Christina A. | V V V V V | D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
34 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | V V V V D V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
35 | BOK Michelle | V D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
36 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
37 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | V V V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
38 | LAN Alice S. | V D V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
39 | DESAI Meera P. | V D V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
40 | CHAN Elizabeth | D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
41 | IGOE Nirali B. | V D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
42 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
43 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
44 | MAO Amy | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
45 | LU Samantha R. | V D V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
46 | GAO Judy | D V V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
47 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
48 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | V V D D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
49 | ASHER Valerie | V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
50 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | V D D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
51 | FELAND Alexandra | V V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
52 | KALE Anika A. | V D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
53 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | V D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
54 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | D V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
55 | SAAL Anna | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
56 | MUELLER Emma M. | D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
57 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
58 | GANSER Yuliya | V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
59 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
60 | SMUK Daria A. | D D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
61 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | D D V D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
62 | PRIHODKO Nina | D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
63 | KIM Zoe L. | D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
64 | DARANOUVONG Logan | V D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
65 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
66 | MING Cynthia | D D V V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
67 | WEBER Nora | D D D V D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
68 | ZENG Katrina | V V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
69 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
70 | PEARSON Heila | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
71 | KIM Jayna | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
72 | YAO KATHARINE | D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
73 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | D V D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
74 | KENT Elizabeth J. | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
75 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | V D D D D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 | |
76 | AHUJA Arianna | D D D V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
77 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | D V D D D D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 | |
78 | LI Alisha | D D D D V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
79 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | D D D V D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
80 | MESCHIA Maggie | D V D D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
81 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | D D D D V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
82 | CAREY Michele S. | D D V D D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
83 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
84 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | D D D D D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 | |
85 | BOWIE Charlotta | D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
86 | POPOVICI Alina B. | D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
87 | NGUYEN Audrey | D D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
88 | HU Chelsea | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
89 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | D D D D D D | 3.2 | 0 | -3.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.