Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 2 | CHENG Ava | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 3 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 3 | ISERT Sarah | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 5 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 6 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 7 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 8 | DONDISCH Sophia | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 9 | BEI Karen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 10 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 11 | MCLANE Lauren | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
| 12 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 13 | COBERT Helen G. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 14 | GABERKORN Nadia | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% |
| 15 | ROSS Naomi O. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 16 | NI Emma | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
| 17 | REID Anousheh | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% | |
| 19 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 20 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 21 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 22 | CHU Audrey | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 23 | LIN Elaine | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
| 25 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% | |
| 26 | SZEWC Alexandra | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 27 | LEE Yedda | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 28 | PAN Michelle | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 29 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% | |
| 31 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | LEANG Andrea K. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 33 | LIU Christina A. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 34 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 35 | BOK Michelle | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 37 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 38 | LAN Alice S. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 39 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 40 | CHAN Elizabeth | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 41 | IGOE Nirali B. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 42 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 43 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | MAO Amy | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 45 | LU Samantha R. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 46 | GAO Judy | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 47 | ZAFFT Sharrie A. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 48 | SWEET Ryleigh E. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | ASHER Valerie | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 50 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 3% |
| 51 | FELAND Alexandra | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 52 | KALE Anika A. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 53 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 54 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 55 | SAAL Anna | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 56 | MUELLER Emma M. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 57 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 58 | GANSER Yuliya | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 59 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 60 | SMUK Daria A. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 61 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | PRIHODKO Nina | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | KIM Zoe L. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 64 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 65 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 66 | MING Cynthia | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 67 | WEBER Nora | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 68 | ZENG Katrina | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 70 | PEARSON Heila | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | KIM Jayna | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 72 | YAO KATHARINE | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 73 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 74 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 75 | POLANICHKA Nicole P. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | |
| 76 | AHUJA Arianna | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 77 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 78 | LI Alisha | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 79 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | 26% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | MESCHIA Maggie | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 81 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 82 | CAREY Michele S. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 83 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 84 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 85 | BOWIE Charlotta | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 86 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 87 | NGUYEN Audrey | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | HU Chelsea | 22% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | PROVANCE Amanda R. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.