Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GUERRA Sofia E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 2 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 3 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
| 3 | WU Kyra | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 5 | ACHILOVA Feyza | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
| 6 | TONG Ophelia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 7 | CHO Cameron S. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 8 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | KOROL Neta | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 10 | KOROL Dana | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 11 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 45% | 16% | |
| 12 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 13 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 14 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 16 | ATLURI Srija | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 17 | PERLMAN Talia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 18 | GU EMILY | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 20 | WU Irene M. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 21 | COOPER Piper W. | - | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 22 | LIU Siyuan | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 23 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 24 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
| 25 | DEBACK Greta I. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 26 | YE Eileen | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 27 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 28 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 29 | CANNON Lira J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 30 | XU Marie-Anne J. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 31 | PANT Anisha | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 32 | LEE Ariana | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
| 34 | DU Hannah | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 35 | SHIH Diane | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 36 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 37 | YIN Helen | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 38 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 39 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 40 | ROY Layla | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 41 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 42 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 43 | DING Abigail | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 43 | BOLES Sophia | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 47 | DUAN Konnie | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 48 | MI Anning | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | PERKINS Jazmin A. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 50 | VOHRA Anusha | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 5% | |
| 51 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 52 | CHON Sydney | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 53 | YU Lauren C. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 54 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 56 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 57 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 58 | YU Jaime L. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 59 | CHEW Alexis T. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 60 | CHARALEL Jessica | 11% | 38% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 62 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 63 | POWERS Meredith R. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 64 | XIANG Emma | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 65 | LIU Sophia | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | JIANG Yangying (Amanda) | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 67 | FU Qihan | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 68 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 1% | 12% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 69 | BHAN Zala | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 70 | SCHUEPPERT Amelia V. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 71 | HSIUNG Samantha | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | KALE Anika A. | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 73 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 74 | BASSIK Eva | 3% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | PAVE Claire | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 76 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 1% | 12% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 77 | OLSEN Jen | 3% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 78 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | KOSLOW Amicie | - | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 80 | NUNLEY Victoria | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 81 | SHUM Elizabeth | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 82 | HSIEH Rebecca | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 84 | DUVVURI Oorvi | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 86 | MEYER Claudia | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | RAO Sonia D. | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 87 | TIBURZI hallie | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 89 | YANG Lingting | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 90 | FURST Chloe | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 91 | BAWA Sahana | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 92 | MOSE Anastasia E. | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 94 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 28% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 95 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 95 | DATLA Medha | 21% | 47% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | QUINN Anna | 40% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | PARK Leah | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 99 | HWANG Alison | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 100 | COKER Bettina M. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 101 | TURNER Stephanie E. | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 101 | VAUGHAN Norah | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 103 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 104 | WEBB Ella | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 105 | CHAPARRO Alejandra | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 106 | MAO Rebecca J. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 107 | CASPER Emily N. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 108 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 109 | MUSTO Isabella | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 110 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 111 | NELSON Gwendolyn H. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 111 | CHEN Jasmine | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 113 | OETZEL Taylor | 36% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 114 | HEISER Anna M. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 115 | SCARLETT Skye | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | BLAM Kaitlin | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 117 | LI Irina | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 118 | NICKOLOV Nora | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 119 | RYDMAN Grace | 19% | 44% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 120 | LIN Victoria T. | 9% | 37% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 121 | MADSEN Ansley | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 122 | HUNT Abigail S. | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 123 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 123 | ROMANO Megan C. | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 125 | SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.