Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 13% |
2 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
3 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
3 | WU Kyra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
5 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 17% |
6 | TONG Ophelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
7 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% |
8 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
9 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
10 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
11 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 16% | |
12 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
13 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
14 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
15 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
16 | ATLURI Srija | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
17 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
18 | GU EMILY | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
19 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
20 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
21 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
22 | LIU Siyuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
23 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
24 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | |
25 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
26 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
27 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
28 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
29 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
30 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
31 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
32 | LEE Ariana | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
33 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% |
34 | DU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
35 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
36 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
37 | YIN Helen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
38 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
39 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
40 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
41 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
42 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
43 | DING Abigail | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
43 | BOLES Sophia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
45 | SCHMIDT Victoria | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
46 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
47 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
48 | MI Anning | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
49 | PERKINS Jazmin A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
50 | VOHRA Anusha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | 5% | |
51 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
52 | CHON Sydney | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 6% |
53 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
54 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
55 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
56 | SULEIMAN Alysa J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
57 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
58 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
59 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
60 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
61 | HUANG NATALIE | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
62 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
63 | POWERS Meredith R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
64 | XIANG Emma | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
65 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
66 | JIANG Yangying (Amanda) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
67 | FU Qihan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
68 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
69 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
70 | SCHUEPPERT Amelia V. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
71 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
72 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
73 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
74 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
75 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
76 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - |
77 | OLSEN Jen | 100% | 97% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
78 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
79 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
80 | NUNLEY Victoria | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
81 | SHUM Elizabeth | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
82 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
83 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% |
84 | DUVVURI Oorvi | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
85 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
86 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
87 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
87 | TIBURZI hallie | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
89 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
90 | FURST Chloe | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
91 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
92 | MOSE Anastasia E. | 100% | 78% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
93 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
94 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 72% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
95 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
95 | DATLA Medha | 100% | 79% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
97 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 60% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
98 | PARK Leah | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
99 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
100 | COKER Bettina M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
101 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
101 | VAUGHAN Norah | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
103 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
104 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
105 | CHAPARRO Alejandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 6% |
106 | MAO Rebecca J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
107 | CASPER Emily N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
108 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
109 | MUSTO Isabella | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
110 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
111 | NELSON Gwendolyn H. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
111 | CHEN Jasmine | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
113 | OETZEL Taylor | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
114 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
115 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 69% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
116 | BLAM Kaitlin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
117 | LI Irina | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
118 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 60% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
119 | RYDMAN Grace | 100% | 81% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
120 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 91% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
121 | MADSEN Ansley | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
122 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
123 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 100% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
123 | ROMANO Megan C. | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
125 | SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.