Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 2 | SHIH Christina | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 3 | ARNECKE Lauren A. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 3 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 5 | YUAN Greta | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 6 | ROGERS Pauline E. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 7 | CHIANG Emily | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 8 | JEAN Olympe G. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 9 | GIRARDI Aemilia | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 10 | TONG Jessie | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 11 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 12 | NGUYEN Ella | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
| 13 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 15 | DAVIS Charlotte | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 16 | EVANS Madelynn | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 17 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 18 | NOVICK Mia J. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 19 | PETE Gillian C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 20 | SUN Alyssa | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 21 | KITTLE Lauren | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | CHIN Elise | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 23 | SINHA Anika | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 24 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 25 | GIBEK Victoria | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | JOHNSTON Lily | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | CHU Catherine G. | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 28 | NG Sarah W. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
| 29 | DRAEKER Margaret | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | SPRINGER Ella | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 31 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 32 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 33 | WEI Vivian W. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 34 | YANG Lea | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 35 | PI Sophia | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 36 | COLTER Aurora | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 36 | LIN Sarah | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 39 | CHANG Audrey | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% |
| 40 | ARNIPALLI Hamsika | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 41 | TSOI Julie | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 42 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 43 | CHEN Athena | 19% | 48% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 45 | KOLL-BRAVMANN Ryder S. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | TUNG Renee | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | MORGAN Elizabeth (Ella) R. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 48 | SCHOEW Margot | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 49 | BAKER Amelia M. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 4% |
| 50 | HUANG MADELINE | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | HORAN Alexa | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | JENKINS Scotland | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 54 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 54 | MCNALLY Teagan | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 56 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 56 | ROBINSON Stella | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | REN Xinling | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 59 | SULLIVAN Kate | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 60 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% |
| 61 | HE Cassandra | 2% | 10% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 62 | HAMMARBERG Shaine Trea | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 63 | FAN Grace | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 64 | MORAN Rhea | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 65 | LIGH Karis | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 66 | FANG sophie | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 67 | DREYER Nadia S. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 68 | TSAI Anna A. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 69 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 69 | WHEELER Kira | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 71 | FREEDMAN Amelia F. | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 72 | YANG Jenny J. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 73 | WILLEMSE Jamie | 6% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 74 | DONADO Caroline A. | - | 2% | 11% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 75 | SCHICK Veronica | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 76 | MU Vicki Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 77 | HAMILTON Ciera | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 78 | BROWN Delaney | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 79 | WEINSTEIN Hannah | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | YU Melinda | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | |
| 81 | CANDEUB Lucy | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 82 | STOODLEY Theresa R. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 83 | STRAYER Sofia I. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 84 | UYANIK Nerine | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | SANDERS Brittany | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 86 | OPPY Mia | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | GEIGER Abigail | 18% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 88 | MESSICK Maya | 8% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 89 | GRIFFIN Afwe | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 89 | ZUIEV Xenia | 15% | 45% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 92 | BOFFOLI Sarah | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 93 | HORMEL Molly | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
| 94 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 32% | 45% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 95 | BAROUCH Susanna | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 95 | MARSH Lisa | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 95 | RODGERS Rachel | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 98 | LU Annamaria | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 99 | DUBE Naomi | 36% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 99 | CHO Michelle | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 101 | KOKAL Genevieve | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 102 | OPPY Eve | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.