Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Irene M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 43% | 34% | |
| 2 | MI Anning | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 3 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 5 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 6 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
| 7 | HWANG Alison | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 8 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 9 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 10 | ROY Layla | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 11 | CANNON Lira J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% | |
| 12 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | WEBB Ella | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 14 | KALE Anika A. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 15 | JENKINS Hannah G. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 16 | SCHMIDT Victoria | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 17 | PANT Anisha | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 18 | FU Qihan | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 4% |
| 19 | COOPER Piper W. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 20 | XU Marie-Anne J. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 21 | COKER Bettina M. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 22 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | DU Hannah | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 24 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 25 | YU Jaime L. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 26% |
| 26 | YANG Lingting | - | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 27 | XIANG Emma | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 28 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 29 | HUNT Abigail S. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | FURST Chloe | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 31 | CHEN Jasmine | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIU Siyuan | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 33 | BHAN Zala | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 34 | LUO Sandra J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% |
| 35 | MUSTO Isabella | 2% | 17% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | YIN Helen | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 37 | CHARALEL Jessica | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 38 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | BRANDON Fionnoula | - | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 40 | MAO Rebecca J. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 41 | LIU Sophia | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 8% | |
| 42 | PERKINS Jazmin A. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 43 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 44 | RAO Sonia D. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 45 | PAVE Claire | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | YANG Liu (Willow) | 1% | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | SCHUEPPERT Amelia V. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 48 | OLSEN Jen | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 49 | SHUM Elizabeth | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 50 | PARK Leah | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 52 | BAWA Sahana | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 53 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 54 | TAMRAGOURI Sucheta | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 55 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | 10% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | MEYER Claudia | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 57 | ROHRING Anna | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | HEISER Anna M. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 59 | DATLA Medha | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 60 | VAUGHAN Norah | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 61 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | BASSIK Eva | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 63 | QUINN Anna | 20% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | LI Irina | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 65 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | NELSON Gwendolyn H. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 67 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 68 | TIBURZI hallie | 2% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 69 | OETZEL Taylor | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | NICKOLOV Nora | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | WININGER-SIEVE Taylor | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 72 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | HSIUNG Samantha | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 3% | |
| 74 | KONDAMANI Anya | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 75 | DUVVURI Oorvi | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | HIMMEL Alexandra | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 77 | SCARLETT Skye | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | LEE Kaitlyn | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. | 9% | 37% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 80 | ROMANO Megan C. | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | MADSEN Ansley | 13% | 47% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | MOSE Anastasia E. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 82 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 84 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | MCLANE Katherine | 58% | 35% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | KAYGUSUZ Zeynep | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | SEMENETS Mira | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | CHACE-ORTIZ Naneen | 1% | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 89 | BLAM Kaitlin | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.