Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WU Irene M. | D V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
2 | MI Anning | V V V D V D | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
3 | PENG Amber L. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
3 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | V V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
5 | SLASKI Caroline O. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 6 | +3.1 |
6 | SIMONOV Dasha | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | HWANG Alison | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
8 | CHEW Alexis T. | D V V V V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
9 | RANDOLPH Piper | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
10 | ROY Layla | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
11 | CANNON Lira J. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | MARKOVSKY Nina | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
13 | WEBB Ella | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
14 | KALE Anika A. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
15 | JENKINS Hannah G. | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
16 | SCHMIDT Victoria | V V D D D D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
17 | PANT Anisha | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
18 | FU Qihan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
19 | COOPER Piper W. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
20 | XU Marie-Anne J. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
21 | COKER Bettina M. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
22 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | V V V D V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
23 | DU Hannah | V V D D V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
24 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
25 | YU Jaime L. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
26 | YANG Lingting | V D V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
27 | XIANG Emma | V V D V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
28 | MORADI Raiyan N. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
29 | HUNT Abigail S. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
30 | FURST Chloe | V D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
31 | CHEN Jasmine | D D V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
32 | LIU Siyuan | D V D D V D | V V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
33 | BHAN Zala | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
34 | LUO Sandra J. | V D V V V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
35 | MUSTO Isabella | D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
36 | YIN Helen | V V D V V D | D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
37 | CHARALEL Jessica | V V D D V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
38 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | V V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
39 | BRANDON Fionnoula | D D V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
40 | MAO Rebecca J. | V V D V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
41 | LIU Sophia | V D V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
42 | PERKINS Jazmin A. | V D D V D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
43 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | D V V V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
44 | RAO Sonia D. | V V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
45 | PAVE Claire | D V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
45 | YANG Liu (Willow) | D V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
47 | SCHUEPPERT Amelia V. | D D V D V V | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
48 | OLSEN Jen | V V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
49 | SHUM Elizabeth | D D D V V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
50 | PARK Leah | V V D D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
51 | ZGOMBIC Emily | V D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
52 | BAWA Sahana | V D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
53 | LIN Victoria T. | V V D V D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
54 | TAMRAGOURI Sucheta | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
55 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
56 | MEYER Claudia | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
57 | ROHRING Anna | D D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
58 | HEISER Anna M. | D D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
59 | DATLA Medha | D V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
60 | VAUGHAN Norah | D D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
61 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | D D V D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
62 | BASSIK Eva | D D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
63 | QUINN Anna | D D D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
64 | LI Irina | D D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
65 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | D V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
66 | NELSON Gwendolyn H. | D D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
67 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | V V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
68 | TIBURZI hallie | D D D V V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
69 | OETZEL Taylor | D D D V V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
70 | NICKOLOV Nora | D V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
71 | WININGER-SIEVE Taylor | V V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
72 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | D V D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
73 | HSIUNG Samantha | D D D V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 | |
74 | KONDAMANI Anya | V D D D D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
75 | DUVVURI Oorvi | D D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
76 | HIMMEL Alexandra | D D D V D D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
77 | SCARLETT Skye | D D D D D V | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
78 | LEE Kaitlyn | D D D D V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
79 | SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. | D D D D V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
80 | ROMANO Megan C. | D V D D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
81 | MADSEN Ansley | D D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
82 | MOSE Anastasia E. | D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
82 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | D D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
84 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
85 | MCLANE Katherine | D D D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
86 | KAYGUSUZ Zeynep | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
87 | SEMENETS Mira | D D D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
88 | CHACE-ORTIZ Naneen | D D D D D D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 | |
89 | BLAM Kaitlin | D D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.