Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FANG Eason | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
2 | PATEL Rayn | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
3 | WANG Max | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
3 | GUREVICH Benjamin | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
5 | KURILO Michael | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
5 | WANG Justin | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
7 | VAID Luke | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
8 | HARDRICK Noah | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
9 | KIM Samuel | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
10 | FEI Danny | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
11 | LIU Ryan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
12 | ZHAO David | 4% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
13 | FENG Brendan | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
14 | LIU Aaron | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
15 | HU Harry | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
16 | GONG Gavin | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
17 | HALL Noah | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
18 | BREUER Daniel | 3% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
19 | MILLER Felix | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
20 | CHAWLA Abhishek | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
21 | MINER Davidson | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
22 | HONG Jaden | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
23 | SOKOLOV Arseniy | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
24 | LEE Gordon | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
25 | YANG Justin | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
26 | LEE Ezra | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
27 | PAUL James | < 1% | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
28 | GRABOWSKI Stanley | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.