Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 72% |
2 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 98% | |
3 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
3 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | - | 5% | 24% | 50% | 21% | |
5 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% | |
6 | PEELER Julia | - | - | 3% | 27% | 68% | 1% | |
7 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 30% | |
8 | DESAI Meera P. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 38% | |
9 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
10 | LEE Yedda | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 39% | 3% | |
11 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 28% | |
11 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | |
13 | YOU Emily | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
14 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 48% | |
15 | PARK Judy | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | - | |
16 | BARCLAY Khyri | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
17 | LIU Nicole | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
18 | EDWARDS Auprell | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 53% | 11% |
19 | MILEWSKI Nicole | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% | |
20 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - | |
21 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 1% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
22 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | - | |
23 | LU Samantha R. | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - |
24 | MING Cynthia | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 9% | |
25 | AMOROSO Elizabeth | 5% | 29% | 46% | 18% | 1% | - | |
26 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 1% | 11% | 37% | 42% | 8% | - | |
27 | MACEDON Gianna | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
28 | LIU Sydney | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
29 | ZHAO Ivy | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
30 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
31 | PULLEN Ayah | 5% | 34% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
32 | ERDMAN Giselle | 20% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
33 | MAGALSKI Mary | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
34 | MIHILL Margaret | 15% | 44% | 33% | 8% | - | - | |
35 | NEELAM Neha | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
36 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 19% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
37 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
38 | LOUGHLIN Ariana | 20% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | HU Chelsea | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - | |
40 | GOSART Hailee | 42% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | OZBOZ almira | 14% | 47% | 32% | 7% | - | - | |
42 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
42 | SAIYED Khadijah | 17% | 43% | 32% | 8% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.