Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% |
2 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | |
3 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | 13% | 1% |
3 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 21% | |
5 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | |
6 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 1% | |
7 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
8 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 38% | |
9 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | |
10 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 3% | |
11 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 28% | |
11 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% | |
13 | YOU Emily | 100% | 94% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
14 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% | |
15 | PARK Judy | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - | |
16 | BARCLAY Khyri | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
17 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
18 | EDWARDS Auprell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 11% |
19 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% | |
20 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
21 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
22 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% | - | |
23 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | 5% | - |
24 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 9% | |
25 | AMOROSO Elizabeth | 100% | 95% | 65% | 20% | 1% | - | |
26 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 8% | - | |
27 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
28 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
29 | ZHAO Ivy | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
30 | NIEMAN Anjolie | 100% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
31 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 95% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
32 | ERDMAN Giselle | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
33 | MAGALSKI Mary | 100% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
34 | MIHILL Margaret | 100% | 85% | 41% | 8% | - | - | |
35 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
36 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
37 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 100% | 84% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
38 | LOUGHLIN Ariana | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | - | |
40 | GOSART Hailee | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | OZBOZ almira | 100% | 86% | 39% | 7% | - | - | |
42 | PLAZA-GASALLA Gloria | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
42 | SAIYED Khadijah | 100% | 83% | 40% | 8% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.