January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Epee (V40ME)

Friday, January 6, 2023 at 8:00 AM

Register

Louisville, KY

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3376 3677 - 3218
5 - 8 2940 3017 - 2857
9 - 16 2593 2911 - 2296
17 - 25 2034 2308 - 1461

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Maczik, Adam Marx Fencing Academy A23 3677 3374.62
2 Makmatov, Vadim Salle Auriol Seattle A22 3371 3062.69
3 Rostal, Scott Twin Cities Fencing Club A22 3238 2885.11
4 Bartlett, Jonathan New York Athletic Club A22 3218 2854.92
5 Pho, Eric Fencers Club Inc. A22 3017 2724.21
6 Liou, Solomon Lilov Fencing Academy C22 2966 2657.40
7 Cheng, Thomas Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club A22 2922 2612.94
8 Wilkinson, Derek On Target Fencing Team B22 2857 2473.55
9 Arrowsmith, Alan Nashville Academy of Fencing B21 2911 2422.45
10 Springer, Michael Olympia Fencing Center A22 2679 2391.55
11 Choi, Paul Fencers Club Inc. B22 2766 2364.16
12 Stock, Jordan Salle Auriol Seattle B22 2447 2152.73
13 Ruskin, David DC Fencers Club C21 2672 2012.38
14 Pengelly, Neil Canadian Fencing Acadamy U 2659 1928.40
15 Mendoza, Zandro LA International Fencing E23 2313 1899.51
16 Hess, Marc Alliance Fencing Academy D22 2296 1862.84
17 Locasale, Nicholas LA International Fencing D21 2184 1767.11
18 Harrell, D. Fox Marx Fencing Academy C21 2261 1734.33
19 Luo, Aaron Fencers Club Inc. E22 2308 1726.09
20 Kim, Jeff Elite Fencing Academy (GA) E22 2037 1618.43
21 Ozanne, Jeffrey Twin Cities Fencing Club D22 2085 1501.11
22 Edgecomb, Michael D22 1897 1484.56
23 Reed, David Rain City Fencing Center U 1863 1463.66
24 McConville, Brendan Cape Fear Fencing Association D22 2208 1235.67
25 Davis, Kelly Resolute Sport Fencing U 1461 968.89

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!