Fencing Center of Chicago RYC/RJCC

Cadet Men’s Foil (CDTMF)

Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:00 AM

Register

Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2982 3251 - 2641
5 - 8 2577 2658 - 2430
9 - 16 2341 2406 - 2262
17 - 32 2127 2347 - 1875
33 - 56 1628 1937 - 806

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lu, Yikai Culver Military Academy B21 3251 2983.45
2 Traugot, Owen Manhattan Fencing Center B22 3208 2950.59
3 Liu, Ethan Renaissance Fencing Club C22 2830 2568.85
4 Tsao, Lukas Renaissance Fencing Club C22 2641 2384.61
5 Wong, Antonio Bluegrass Fencers' Club B22 2642 2375.80
6 Dore, Davis Fencing Center Of Chicago C22 2658 2327.38
7 Guth, Joseph Cleveland Fencing Academy D22 2577 2321.65
8 Gogoi, Vir Renaissance Fencing Club B21 2430 2159.43
9 McIsaac, Finn Renaissance Fencing Club C22 2406 2141.66
10 Palma, Nathan Anthony Columbus Fencing And Fitness LLC U 2366 2114.31
11 Zhao, Nathan Bluegrass Fencers' Club E22 2341 2082.41
12 McKinley, Luke Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E22 2399 2067.06
13 Stringer, David Renaissance Fencing Club C22 2319 2056.62
14 Shevchenko, Kostiantyn Renaissance Fencing Club C22 2301 2045.74
15 Polonski, Anthony Fencing Center Of Chicago D22 2335 2017.53
16 Howland, Jonas Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E22 2262 1993.57
17 Olson, Emerson Twin Cities Fencing Club D22 2347 1971.54
18 Slusher, Gideon West Michigan Fencing Academy E22 2256 1958.36
19 Santos, Carlos Grand Rapids Fencing Academy C21 2195 1929.63
20 Chuang, Oscar Fencing Center Of Chicago E23 2167 1909.38
21 Zhao, Bowen The Fencers Academy B23 2172 1888.59
22 Mette, Russell Buccaneer Blades Fencing D22 2346 1884.25
23 Xiao, Bowen Culver Military Academy D22 2265 1879.36
24 Boyko, Miles The Fencers Academy D22 2149 1847.58
25 VanOyen, Dominick Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E22 2118 1832.71
26 Kue, Temujin Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 2050 1754.79
27 Rajpal, Alastair Fencing Center Of Chicago E22 2052 1733.79
28 Biesiada, Jan Louisville Fencing Center, Inc. D22 2042 1683.91
29 Neyman, Sampson E22 2116 1633.24
30 Fu, Steven Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy C22 1992 1590.65
31 Heyboer, Jason Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1885 1537.33
32 Phonprasansack, Grayson Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1875 1516.05
33 Mavani, Krishna Renaissance Fencing Club E22 1818 1490.98
34 Lockwood, Jacob Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1793 1454.90
35 Towne, Benjamin Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D22 1854 1454.55
36 Wingler, Cole Royal Arts Fencing Academy U 1860 1382.43
37 Nazario, Dominic Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E22 1774 1357.87
38 Holliday, Christopher Mansfield-Scott RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1820 1355.97
39 Irvine, Brody Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1776 1277.23
40 Glover, George Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E22 1644 1254.40
41 Reaume, Nate Grand Rapids Fencing Academy E22 1595 1231.58
42 Smith, Cooper Madison Fencing Academy E22 1759 1206.18
43 Griffith, Kian Heartland Fencing Academy E22 1895 1157.94
44 Modadugu, Aryan Cleveland Fencing Academy U 1547 1065.02
45 Tate, Liam West Michigan Fencing Academy U 1629 1048.14
46 Herrera, Xavier Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1478 1043.97
47 Weiss, Quintin Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1491 1039.73
48 Sanders, Jack Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 1562 946.30
49 Ryan, Nash Royal Arts Fencing Academy U 1472 826.44
50 Lakas, Darius Illinois Fencing Academy U 1374 595.36
51 Mick, Gabriel West Michigan Fencing Academy U 1201 578.09
52 Mokbel, Yassin Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1615 300.74
53 Fiedor, Jakub Illinois Fencing Academy U 1649 56.31
54 Rubenstein, Desmond U 1937 10.56
55 Wei, Thomas The Fencers Academy U 806 < 0
56 He, Ethan Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1724 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!