The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Jason Liu and (2) Abdel Salem.

Event Preview

Cadet Women’s Epee (CDTWE)

Motor City SYC/RCCSunday, April 16, 2023 at 12:00 PM

UWM Sports Complex · Pontiac, MI
29 approved entrants 4 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2777 2970 - 2627
5 - 8 2542 2562 - 2533
9 - 16 2363 2562 - 2214
17 - 29 1771 2084 - 872

Registrations

1 Song, Angela Cavalier Fencing Club A23 2970 2708.37
2 Elston, Sophia Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy B23 2787 2527.84
3 Franger, Macy Escrime Du Lac U 2723 2467.48
4 Xu, Serena Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) C23 2627 2370.44
5 Sun, Zeyu Unattached C23 2562 2305.74
6 Su, Evelyn Unattached C23 2538 2285.31
7 Liscum, Vivian Alliance Fencing Academy D23 2533 2279.58
8 Nix, Reagan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C23 2536 2278.63
9 Schmitt, Harper Escrime Du Lac D22 2509 2255.40
10 Balazs, Luca Toronto Fencing Club U 2562 2253.90
11 Martinez, Christina Epee Miami Fencing Club U 2406 2149.90
12 Haynes, Antonia Windy City Fencing-Chicago D22 2346 2048.57
13 Echeverry, Sofia Epee Miami Fencing Club E22 2381 1991.06
14 Iyer, Ishana Fencing Center Of Chicago D23 2238 1983.69
15 Fan, Elizabeth Unattached C23 2214 1933.31
16 Davis, Jennifer Royal Arts Fencing Academy E22 2247 1924.73
17 Elterman, Kate Windy City Fencing-Chicago U 2084 1833.20
18 Tam, Connie Unattached U 2049 1786.17
19 Read, Lyla Twin Cities Fencing Club U 2042 1765.60
20 Nguyen, Ella Windy City Fencing-Chicago E23 2029 1764.86
21 Nelson, Grace Escrime Du Lac E23 1935 1661.96
22 BO, GENESIS Unattached E22 1947 1615.86
23 Chuang, Ramona Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1830 1558.37
24 Chang, Abigail True Focus Sports Academy D23 1824 1538.85
25 Mirza, Annoshae Windy City Fencing-Chicago E23 1834 1522.98
26 Chan, Macie Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1650 1323.33
27 Fang, Jocelyn Unattached U 1721 1301.16
28 fang, jenna kim Unattached U 1206 442.37
29 Natesan, Nithya Two Ravens Fencing School U 872 < 0

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.