San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Dylan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 2 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 3 | TUNG Ryan | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 3 | LI Yiwei | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 5 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 6 | RAMANAN Govind | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 7 | GAY Jono | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 8 | WANG Zhuoyi | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 9 | HWANG Jayden | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 10 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 11 | KANG Evan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Zejia E. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 13 | HO Anson | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | JAIN Samyak | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 15 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 16 | TSE Aiden J | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | KANG Matthew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 18 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | VAN DE VOOREN Makisig | 2% | 28% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | LAUREYNS Jasper F. | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 21 | CHAN Henry | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.