San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% |
| 2 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
| 3 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 3 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 5 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 6 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 7 | GAY Jono | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 8 | WANG Zhuoyi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 9 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 10 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 11 | KANG Evan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Zejia E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 13 | HO Anson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 15 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 16 | TSE Aiden J | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | KANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 18 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | VAN DE VOOREN Makisig | 100% | 98% | 70% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 20 | LAUREYNS Jasper F. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | CHAN Henry | 100% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.