Garfield, NJ - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | EMMER Chase T. | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
2 | BAS Liam | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
3 | HO Ryan J. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 9% |
3 | JANG Jaewon | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
5 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | 8% | 34% | 44% | 13% |
6 | PRILUTSKY David B. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 50% |
7 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 36% | 3% |
8 | YU Vinni | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
9 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
10 | LEE Chris | 5% | 30% | 41% | 21% | 4% | |
11 | ONIK Elijah T. | - | 1% | 10% | 45% | 40% | 4% |
12 | BAE Kevin | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
13 | PYO Michael M. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
14 | SINGH Dayaal | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 16% | |
15 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 3% | 40% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
16 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 10% | 59% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
17 | HERGERT Benito | - | 4% | 27% | 45% | 22% | 3% |
18 | LEE Jacob J | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
19 | BROWN Alexander R. | 12% | 56% | 29% | 3% | - | - |
20 | CAI Oliver K. | 1% | 21% | 53% | 22% | 3% | - |
21 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 4% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
22 | TORRES Treston | 54% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
23 | FU Samuel Y. | - | 8% | 39% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
24 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | - | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
25 | SONG Bryan | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
26 | REZA Farazi | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | GUPTA Varun | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
28 | PATEL Kapil | 77% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - |
29 | MENG Xiang | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.