Garfield, NJ - Garfield, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YEN Darren | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | BARNETT Adam | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | GETS Matthew D. | V V D D D | V V V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 3 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | D V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 5 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 6 | SHI Andrew | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | MORREALE John | V D V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 8 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | V D D D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | DEGEORGES Cole C. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 11 | YEN Preston | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | NG Jeremiah | D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 13 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | D D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 14 | JACOBSON Matthew A. | V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 15 | ALTIRS Alexander | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 16 | BULL Anderson | D V D D V | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 17 | WILSON Jude | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 18 | HONG Vincent Q. | V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | HAST Kern R. | V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | MARGULIES William | V V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 21 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | V D V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 22 | HUANG Ethan F. | V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | RAUSCHER Ryan | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 24 | HUANG Tyler T. | D V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 25 | GREENE Alexander J. | D V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 26 | COLE Alexander | D D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 27 | DENG Andrew | D V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | CHEN Evan P. | V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 29 | BUCCINO George | V D D D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 30 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | YAO Jonathan | D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 32 | GHAYALOD ansh | D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 33 | CADAMBI Roshan | V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 34 | LEDERER Justin W. | V D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 35 | DA GRACA Aidan | V D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 36 | GILPIN Samuel | V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 37 | EAVES Jude | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | MOULTON Ian | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 39 | YUAN Kevin | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 40 | MIRDALA Drew | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 41 | ALTIRS Giorgio | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 42 | FLITSANOV Macabee | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 43 | WRUBEL Natan G. | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 44 | KEOGH Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.