Garfield, NJ - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YEN Darren | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 47% | 42% |
2 | BARNETT Adam | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% | |
3 | GETS Matthew D. | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
3 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
5 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
6 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 34% | |
7 | MORREALE John | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 14% | |
8 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | - |
9 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
10 | DEGEORGES Cole C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
11 | YEN Preston | - | 1% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 9% | |
12 | NG Jeremiah | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
13 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | - | 9% | 42% | 49% | |
14 | JACOBSON Matthew A. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
15 | ALTIRS Alexander | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
16 | BULL Anderson | 1% | 12% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | WILSON Jude | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
18 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 2% | 19% | 52% | 24% | 3% | |
19 | HAST Kern R. | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% | |
20 | MARGULIES William | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
21 | MOLINA Nicholas (Nico) G. | - | - | 2% | 21% | 52% | 24% | |
22 | HUANG Ethan F. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
23 | RAUSCHER Ryan | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 4% | |
24 | HUANG Tyler T. | 8% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
25 | GREENE Alexander J. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
26 | COLE Alexander | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
27 | DENG Andrew | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
28 | CHEN Evan P. | 10% | 38% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
29 | BUCCINO George | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
30 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 2% | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | - | |
31 | YAO Jonathan | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 14% | |
32 | GHAYALOD ansh | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
33 | CADAMBI Roshan | 19% | 53% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
34 | LEDERER Justin W. | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
35 | DA GRACA Aidan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
36 | GILPIN Samuel | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | EAVES Jude | 17% | 53% | 28% | 2% | - | - | |
38 | MOULTON Ian | 21% | 54% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
39 | YUAN Kevin | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
40 | MIRDALA Drew | 29% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
41 | ALTIRS Giorgio | 10% | 50% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | FLITSANOV Macabee | 55% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
43 | WRUBEL Natan G. | 60% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | |
44 | KEOGH Jonathan | 23% | 48% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.