RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 31% |
2 | TANN Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
3 | UEYAMA Ietetsu A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
3 | WU Mengke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
5 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 12% |
6 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 38% |
7 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 16% |
8 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
9 | YUN Jaesun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
10 | BARRETO Elliott | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 20% | |
11 | BREIER Satchel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
12 | FRIAS Saul F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
13 | LIM William J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
14 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
15 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
16 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
17 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 12% | 1% |
18 | CASTRO-SOLIS HUGO ABEL | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
19 | CHOI Silas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
20 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 6% |
21 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 20% |
22 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
23 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
24 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
25 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
26 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
27 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
28 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - |
29 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 13% |
30 | RHEE Ethan N. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
31 | PATRICO Peter | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
32 | VELTZ Tyler J. | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
33 | BAUER Hank E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
34 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
35 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
36 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
37 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
38 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
39 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
40 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
41 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
42 | POFF James | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
43 | XU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
44 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
45 | BRISTOL Brijen | 100% | 84% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
46 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
47 | BRAKEY Ryan | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
48 | BYON Julian | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
49 | SCOVILL Tenzin S. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
50 | GUO Ethan | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
51 | LO Konnor | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
52 | RAJAN Advait | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | LLAMAS Diego F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
53 | CHEN Lohen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
55 | HERRERA Aragon | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
56 | LEE Noah | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
57 | CENTENO Zachary | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | KOH Caleb | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
59 | HJERPE Wade H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
60 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
61 | TSAI Michael T. | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
62 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.