RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KRASILNIKOV Rostislav | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 16% |
| 2 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 42% | 20% |
| 3 | BERGER Oliver | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 3 | BARRETO Elliott | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
| 5 | CHOI Silas | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 6 | CASTRO-SOLIS HUGO ABEL | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 7 | CHEN Howard | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 8 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 42% | 12% |
| 9 | XU William | - | - | 8% | 37% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
| 10 | WU Mengke | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 38% | 12% |
| 11 | YUN Jaesun | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 12 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | 6% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% | |
| 13 | AURAY Phileas | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 14 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | ||
| 15 | BARBER William S. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 20% | ||
| 16 | JIANG Anthony | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 15% |
| 17 | BARBUTA Andrew | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 17 | ROCHA Alejandro | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
| 19 | WANG Eric Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 44% | 15% | |
| 20 | FALLICK Ozzie | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 44% | 14% | |
| 21 | BEAM David E. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 22 | HJERPE Wade H. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | HOLZ William A. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 24 | TAO Stone Z. | - | - | 5% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 2% |
| 25 | KROON Lucas | 3% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | REYES Xavier M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 27 | FRIAS Saul F. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% |
| 28 | QIU Nathan | 3% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | ||
| 29 | LIM William J. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LIN Daniel | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 31 | XU Andrew | 1% | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | |
| 32 | LI Yiwei | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | HOLZ Daniel | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | ||
| 34 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 35 | ANFORA Andrew T. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | KUMAR Sachit | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | BRISTOL Brijen | 8% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | NOBLE Daniel | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 39 | RAJAN Advait | 2% | 48% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | CAISSE Simon B. | 9% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | CENTENO Zachary | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | BAUER Hank E. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 43 | LEITH Jack | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | YANG Dylan | 3% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 46 | NIETO Titus P. | 47% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | REED Samuel J. | 1% | 28% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | LO Konnor | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Yankun | 11% | 38% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | KANDLIK Aaron K. | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | UYANIK Muhammet | 26% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | CHEN Lester | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | ||
| 53 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 10% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | GOMES John F. | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | GUO Ethan | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | MATTHEWS William | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | CHANG LAWRENCE | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.