RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XU Ellen | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 2 | VESTEL Mira B. | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 3 | JUNG Irene | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 5 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 6 | CODY Alexandra C. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 7 | ZUO Xiaofan | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 8 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 9 | NOVICK Mia J. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 10 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | HOLMES Emma | V D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 12 | WU Lanting | V D D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | V V V V D D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 14 | WIGGINS Yaanathia | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | ERIKSON Kira R. | D V V D D D | V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 16 | YANG Lea | V D D D D V | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 17 | FEARNS Zara A. | V V V D V V | D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 18 | TONG Jessie | V D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 19 | TSOI Julie | V V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | V V D D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 21 | NGUYEN Siena | D V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | CHAVEZ Frine | D D V V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | CHIN Elise | D V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | ZHANG Rongruo | V V D V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | LEE Lauren | D D V V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 26 | HU Michelle | D V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 27 | WHITESIDES Abigail E. | D D D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 28 | HUANG MADELINE | V D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | SOWERS Lia | V D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 30 | GOMES Diana C. | D D V D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | LIN Nicole | D D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 32 | CHO Michelle | D D D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | BARTON Mele | V D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 34 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 35 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 36 | KIM Olive | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | NEELEY Leilani | D D D D V D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 38 | MORAN Rhea | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 39 | OLKO Sophie | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 40 | KOH Carisa | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 41 | ANTEBI Sarah | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.