Miami University Phillips Hall - Oxford, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BRADFORD Jack | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 2 | GUINAN III Joseph | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 3 | DEUCHER Joe | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 3 | LI Jesse | - | - | 4% | 42% | 54% | |
| 5 | GERAGHTY Michael | - | 1% | 23% | 52% | 24% | |
| 6 | SCHULTZ Alex | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
| 7 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
| 8 | WU Jimmy | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 9 | CHAN Matthew | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% |
| 10 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
| 11 | SWANSON Dave | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 3% |
| 12 | SOZANSKI Kyle | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 13 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 14 | WILLIAMS Richard | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 15 | DEMANGONE Reed | 12% | 74% | 14% | - | - | |
| 16 | CILLEY Arthur | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 17 | TLUCHOWSKI Sam | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | HENDRIX Jonathan | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | THOMAS Nathan | 7% | 48% | 43% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | BANDALA Alex | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 21 | MCKENNA Liam | 2% | 26% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 22 | BRISKI Loyd | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | - |
| 23 | BONAUDI Cheney | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 24 | WANG Zhiwei | 9% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 24 | PACK Josh | 50% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | FOSTER Molly | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 27 | AHMED Sabreen | 5% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | KING Alice | 25% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | MCCOY Brennan | 15% | 41% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.