Skokie, IL - Skokie, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||
| 1 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 2 | NARANJO David E. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 3 | MURZYN III CJ | - | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 3 | LIU Jonathan M. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 5 | BIRKS Evan D. | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 31% | 26% | 11% | 3% | - | - |
| 6 | AN David | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 7 | SCHIRF Aidan | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 8 | GUO Thomas | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 9 | BRADFORD Ethan | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 10 | PARK Caleb | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 25% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.