Phoenix Fencing Academy - Tempe, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NOBLE Daniel | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 2 | BARBER William S. | - | - | 1% | 18% | 53% | 29% | |
| 3 | DEANS Donovan | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% | |
| 3 | BURR Tanner B. | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% | 1% | |
| 5 | BOROJERDI Ameen | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 6 | HWANG Gabi M. | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 48% | 12% | |
| 7 | HJERPE Wade H. | - | - | 5% | 46% | 39% | 9% | |
| 8 | QIU Nathan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% |
| 9 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 2% | 19% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 10 | LEITH Jack | - | - | 2% | 26% | 48% | 22% | 2% |
| 11 | RAJAN Advait | - | 8% | 39% | 44% | 10% | - | |
| 12 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
| 13 | REBELLO Derek | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 17% | - | |
| 14 | WONG James T. | - | - | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | HICHA Paul R. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | ANDERSON William | 24% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 17 | MONSON Eli | 26% | 47% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
| 18 | FREY Sarah E. | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 19 | KAUFMAN Josh B. | 2% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | VASQUEZ Zoe | 2% | 49% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 2% | 23% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | LYMAN Lily | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | - | - | |
| 23 | MCCOY Audrey "Zoe" | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 24 | JOHNSON Kai | 14% | 39% | 36% | 11% | - | - | |
| 25 | TRIMBLE Max | 9% | 62% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.