Phoenix Fencing Academy - Tempe, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | |
| 2 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 29% | |
| 3 | DEANS Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | |
| 3 | BURR Tanner B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | 1% | |
| 5 | BOROJERDI Ameen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 6 | HWANG Gabi M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 12% | |
| 7 | HJERPE Wade H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 48% | 9% | |
| 8 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 15% |
| 9 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | 5% | - | |
| 10 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 24% | 2% |
| 11 | RAJAN Advait | 100% | 100% | 92% | 54% | 10% | - | |
| 12 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 7% | |
| 13 | REBELLO Derek | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 17% | - | |
| 14 | WONG James T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 2% |
| 15 | HICHA Paul R. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | ANDERSON William | 100% | 76% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 17 | MONSON Eli | 100% | 74% | 27% | 2% | - | - | |
| 18 | FREY Sarah E. | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 19 | KAUFMAN Josh B. | 100% | 98% | 72% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | VASQUEZ Zoe | 100% | 98% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 98% | 75% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 22 | LYMAN Lily | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
| 23 | MCCOY Audrey "Zoe" | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 24 | JOHNSON Kai | 100% | 86% | 47% | 11% | - | - | |
| 25 | TRIMBLE Max | 100% | 91% | 29% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.