Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 2 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 3 | PAUL Anna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 3 | FALINSKA Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
| 5 | DUNLAP-SMITH Azaline I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
| 6 | SNIDER Margot (Maggie) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 11% | |
| 7 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
| 8 | BROOKS Tean R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% | |
| 9 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 66% | 20% |
| 10 | LOMBARD Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 11 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 12 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% |
| 13 | SCALA Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 14 | SZPAK Lara K. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | WOLF Isabella A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | |
| 16 | VANDERLINDEN Mira | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | DOUGLAS Mary K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | BURN Lauren M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | DU Yiyun (Doreen) | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
| 22 | SEMMEL Rose F. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | GUPTA Ananya B. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 24 | OH Kaitlin Y. | 100% | 94% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | LUONG Shirley | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | BOLES Savvianna | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | SCHAFF Marlene M. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | BECKER Carson E. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ONO Melisa | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | REAM Jann L. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | COVITZ Ashley A. | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | WU Mia | 100% | 71% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.