Jersey City, NJ - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
2 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 50% | 19% |
3 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
3 | YU Lauren C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% |
5 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
6 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | - | 8% | 40% | 51% |
7 | SHA Yi Ling | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
8 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
9 | HUANG NATALIE | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
10 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
11 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
12 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
13 | ROY Layla | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 23% | 3% |
14 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
15 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
16 | YANG Iris | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
17 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
18 | WU Julianna Y. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
19 | FU Qihan | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 6% |
20 | LI Rachel Y. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
21 | HSIEH Rebecca | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
22 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
23 | WANG Jasmine | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
24 | SHENG Chuxi | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
25 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
26 | LEVY Avery | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
27 | XIANG Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
28 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
29 | LIN Victoria T. | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
30 | LENZ Zoe N. | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
30 | HOU Wendong | 2% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
32 | BENNETT Abigail | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
33 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
34 | WEI Angela | 6% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
35 | CHEN Jasmine | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
36 | BIENSTOCK Alexis | 15% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
37 | NEUMAN Sophie | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
38 | PAULUS Isabella | 10% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
39 | HSIEH Sabrina | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
40 | CHEN Miley | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
41 | STECKER camille | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | WANG Reese | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.