Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | LAI Adam J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | JEAN Noe T. | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 5 | GHENEA George Philipe | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | SIMAK Joseph P. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 7 | JOHNSON Langston C. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | WOODWARD Connor | V V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | ZHOU Kevin | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 10 | CHIN Matthew W. | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 11 | ZHENG Edward L. | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 12 | BRAR Sanjeet | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 13 | LI Joshua L. | D V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 14 | LU Caleb Q. | V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 15 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | D V V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 16 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 17 | HUANG Ethan F. | V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 18 | FORT David | D V D V V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 19 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | D V V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 20 | PAN Andrew W. | V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | MURZYN III CJ | V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 22 | MARGULIES William | D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 23 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 24 | KORINTH Alexander J. | V V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 25 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 26 | ZHU Charlie | D D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 27 | TOZZI Massimo | V D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 28 | AN Damon | D D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 29 | CHEONG Heonjae | D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 30 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | D D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 32 | WANG Andrew | D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 33 | PANCHAL Shival | V D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | STONE Esmond A. | D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 35 | STONE Christopher A. | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 36 | FERBER Oliver E. | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 37 | CHEN Ethan | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.