Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
| 2 | LAI Adam J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% | |
| 3 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 3 | JEAN Noe T. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 5 | GHENEA George Philipe | - | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 6 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% | |
| 7 | JOHNSON Langston C. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
| 8 | WOODWARD Connor | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 7% | |
| 9 | ZHOU Kevin | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
| 10 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% | |
| 11 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% | |
| 12 | BRAR Sanjeet | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 13 | LI Joshua L. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
| 14 | LU Caleb Q. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 15 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% | |
| 17 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 18 | FORT David | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | PAN Andrew W. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 21 | MURZYN III CJ | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 22 | MARGULIES William | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 6% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 19% | 48% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | ZHU Charlie | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | TOZZI Massimo | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | AN Damon | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | CHEONG Heonjae | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 30 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
| 32 | WANG Andrew | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | PANCHAL Shival | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 34 | STONE Esmond A. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 35 | STONE Christopher A. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 36 | FERBER Oliver E. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | CHEN Ethan | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.