Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 2 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
| 3 | CHO Cameron S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 3 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 5 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 6 | SHIH Diane | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 7 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 8 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
| 9 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 10 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% |
| 11 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
| 12 | KONG Olivia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 13 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 14 | DUAN Konnie | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% |
| 15 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 16 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 17 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 18 | KOSLOW Amicie | - | - | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | KOROL Dana | - | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 20 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | FUNG Emma | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 22 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 3% |
| 24 | OTEYZA Camille | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 25 | WANG Zoie Z. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 26 | CASTANEDA Keira | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LEE Ji Ahn | 1% | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
| 29 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 30 | DO Leila | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | HSIUNG Samantha | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | HWANG Alison | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | CHEN Chloe I. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 37 | BOLES Amanda X. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LEE Allison | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | MU Allison | 7% | 45% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% |
| 41 | PENG Serena | 7% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | PATTERSON Natalia | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | KIM Rachel | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SUN Emily | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | FUNG Vera | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 46 | LUH Mia P. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | CABALU Alaina | 18% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | ENRILE Erica | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 51% | 46% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | ZHENG Zoe | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | NICKOLOV Nora | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | ZHONG Aleena | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LUO Annabella | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | BUGA SOPHIE | 42% | 54% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | WANG Celine S. | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.