Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 2 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 3 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% |
| 3 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% |
| 5 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 6 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 7 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% |
| 8 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
| 9 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% |
| 10 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
| 11 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 23% |
| 12 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 13 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
| 14 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
| 15 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
| 16 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 17 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 18 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 19 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 20 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 22 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
| 24 | OTEYZA Camille | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 25 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 26 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 27 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 29 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 30 | DO Leila | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 37 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LEE Allison | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 39 | MU Allison | 100% | 93% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
| 41 | PENG Serena | 100% | 93% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SUN Emily | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 46 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 82% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 100% | 49% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | ZHONG Aleena | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | LUO Annabella | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | BUGA SOPHIE | 100% | 58% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.