Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG Eric Y. | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 2 | HOLZ William A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 3 | JEFFORDS Alexander | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 3 | XU William | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | YANG Ziyi | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | REYES Xavier M. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | HOLZ Daniel | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 8 | GHAYALOD ansh | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 9 | STONE Esmond A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 10 | SWORDS Evan F. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | JIANG Anthony | D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 12 | RHEE Ethan N. | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | KOTOV Leonid | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 14 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | V D V D V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | JINICH Ilan R. | V D D V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 16 | BAUER Hank E. | D V V D D D | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 17 | VO Minh Q. | D V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | AVAKIAN Alec | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 19 | LO Konnor | V D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 20 | LIM William J. | V V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | V V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 22 | XU Andrew | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | CAISSE Simon B. | V V V D D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 24 | COVINGTON Max G. | D V D V V D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 25 | WONG James T. | D D V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 26 | QIU Nathan | V D V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 26 | KORINTH Alexander J. | V V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 28 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | D V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 29 | BYON Adrian | D D V V V D | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 30 | BULL Anderson | V D D D D V | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 31 | KIM Andrew H. | D D V D D V | V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
| 32 | LIU Christopher X. | D V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 33 | REED Samuel J. | V D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | RAMANAN Govind | D V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 35 | BYON Julian | V V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 35 | LEITH Jack | V V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 37 | CHANIN Liam R. | D D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 38 | RAJAN Advait | V D V D V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 39 | CHAN Aidan | V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 40 | CHANG Colin S. | D D D V V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 41 | YANG Dylan | D V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 42 | ZHANG Yankun | D D V D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 43 | TUNG Ryan | D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 44 | WOO Brian | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 45 | KIM Evan | V D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 46 | KROON Lucas | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 47 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | V D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 48 | CASSIM Shayan | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 49 | LIN Daniel | D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
| 50 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 51 | PADOS Tamas | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 52 | LO Andrew T. | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 53 | TAYLOR Christopher | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 54 | MENDOZA Noah | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.