Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 2 | HOLZ William A. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% |
| 3 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 3 | XU William | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
| 5 | YANG Ziyi | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 6 | REYES Xavier M. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 31% | |
| 7 | HOLZ Daniel | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 8 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 9 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 4% |
| 10 | SWORDS Evan F. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | JIANG Anthony | - | - | 1% | 13% | 46% | 40% | |
| 12 | RHEE Ethan N. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 13 | KOTOV Leonid | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 14 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 15 | JINICH Ilan R. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 16 | BAUER Hank E. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 17 | VO Minh Q. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 19 | LO Konnor | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | LIM William J. | 1% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 21 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 16% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | XU Andrew | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 23 | CAISSE Simon B. | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | COVINGTON Max G. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
| 25 | WONG James T. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | QIU Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 26 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | BYON Adrian | 22% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | BULL Anderson | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 31 | KIM Andrew H. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 32 | LIU Christopher X. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | REED Samuel J. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 34 | RAMANAN Govind | 3% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | BYON Julian | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LEITH Jack | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | CHANIN Liam R. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | RAJAN Advait | 2% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | CHAN Aidan | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | CHANG Colin S. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 41 | YANG Dylan | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 42 | ZHANG Yankun | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | TUNG Ryan | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | WOO Brian | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | KIM Evan | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | KROON Lucas | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 47 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 48 | CASSIM Shayan | 6% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | LIN Daniel | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 50 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 51 | PADOS Tamas | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LO Andrew T. | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | TAYLOR Christopher | 12% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | MENDOZA Noah | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.