Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KOROL Neta | V V D V D V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 2 | WONG Cheryl | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | SUN Chien-Yu | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | TAN Clarisse | D V D D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 5 | PENG Amber L. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | PRIETO Sofia M. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | KOROL Dana | V V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | LUO Sandra J. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | FERNANDES Thea | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 10 | FUNG Emma | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | CHEW Alexis T. | V V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | FUNG Vera | V V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 14 | LEE Ji Ahn | V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | WANG Zoie Z. | D V D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | SUN Emily | D V D D D | V V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 17 | CHEN Chloe I. | V V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | HWANG Alison | V D V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 19 | ZHANG Eunice | V D D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 20 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | D D V V V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 21 | LI Shuang | V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 22 | MORADI Raiyan N. | D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 23 | PENG Serena | D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 24 | MU Allison | D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 25 | CASTANEDA Keira | D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | PATTERSON Natalia | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | HSIUNG Samantha | D V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | LEE Allison | D D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | RAO Sonia D. | D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 30 | NAM Cassie | V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 31 | ZHENG Zoe | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | WANG Celine S. | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 34 | NICKOLOV Nora | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | PARK Leah | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 36 | OLORVIDA Isabella | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 37 | BALCE Cyril | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.