Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KOROL Neta | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 26% |
2 | WONG Cheryl | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
3 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
3 | TAN Clarisse | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% | |
5 | PENG Amber L. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
6 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
7 | KOROL Dana | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
8 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
9 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
10 | FUNG Emma | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
11 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
12 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
13 | FUNG Vera | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
14 | LEE Ji Ahn | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
15 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
16 | SUN Emily | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
17 | CHEN Chloe I. | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - |
18 | HWANG Alison | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% | |
19 | ZHANG Eunice | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
20 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
21 | LI Shuang | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
22 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 1% | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
23 | PENG Serena | 11% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
24 | MU Allison | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
25 | CASTANEDA Keira | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
26 | PATTERSON Natalia | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
27 | HSIUNG Samantha | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | - |
28 | LEE Allison | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
29 | RAO Sonia D. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
30 | NAM Cassie | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
31 | ZHENG Zoe | 10% | 49% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
32 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
33 | WANG Celine S. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
34 | NICKOLOV Nora | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
35 | PARK Leah | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
36 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
37 | BALCE Cyril | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.