Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 2 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
| 3 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
| 3 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
| 5 | BUSH emma | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 7 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% | |
| 8 | LEE Natasha | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 15% | |
| 9 | YAO Yilin | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 10 | BARBARA Camille | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 11 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | LIN Ashley | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 13 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | SHELIN Chelsea | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 16 | ENRILE Erica | 24% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | HSU Adele Y. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 18 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 48% | 18% | |
| 19 | LI Charlotte | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 20 | GAURIAT Jade S. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 3% |
| 21 | LEE Megan | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | CHANG Celine A. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 44% | 32% | |
| 24 | XU Katelyn | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | MUN Brianna K. | - | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 26 | LEE Olivia | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 28 | HAU Olivia | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 29 | MA Katelyn | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | GAUR Ishi | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 4% | |
| 31 | WANG Angelina | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 33 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 1% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
| 34 | RUIZ Lusciana | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | CHA Eugenie | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% | |
| 37 | POON Desiree | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | BROWN Riley | 42% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | HASIM Eurietta | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 41 | LEE Camilla | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LOUIE Sarah | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | LYU Jiaqi | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | BOLES Amanda X. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | LANGEVIN Sophie | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MEWES Katie M. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 50 | HABERMAN Hailey | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Clara | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 52 | LUH Mia P. | 37% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.