Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 2 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 3 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 3 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 40% |
| 5 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 6 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 9% | |
| 7 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 8 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% | |
| 9 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% | |
| 10 | BARBARA Camille | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 11 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 13 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% |
| 16 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | HSU Adele Y. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 18 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 18% | |
| 19 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
| 20 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% |
| 21 | LEE Megan | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 24 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 26 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 28 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | MA Katelyn | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | GAUR Ishi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 4% | |
| 31 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 33 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 9% | |
| 34 | RUIZ Lusciana | 100% | 90% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
| 37 | POON Desiree | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | BROWN Riley | 100% | 58% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 41 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | LOUIE Sarah | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | LYU Jiaqi | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | LANGEVIN Sophie | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MEWES Katie M. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 50 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Clara | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 63% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.