Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Cheryl | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 2 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 43% |
| 3 | JO Mia C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% |
| 3 | CHO Cameron S. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 5 | PETROVA Kristina | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 6 | PENG Amber L. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | LUU Shanon K. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 8 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 9 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 22% |
| 10 | KOROL Dana | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 11 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
| 12 | KIM Katherine | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 13 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% |
| 14 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | RAO Sonia D. | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | TAN Clarisse | 1% | 11% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 18 | KOROL Neta | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 20 | CHEW Alexis T. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 21 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 22 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 23 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 24 | DUAN Konnie | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | FUNG Emma | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 26 | KALE Anika A. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | HSIUNG Samantha | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | PANT Anisha | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 6% |
| 30 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 5% |
| 31 | CHEN Chloe I. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | PATTERSON Natalia | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% |
| 34 | YU Seneca | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 40% | 8% |
| 35 | CASTANEDA Keira | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | SHIH Diane | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 37 | KANG Jiyoon | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | HWANG Alison | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 39 | WANG Zoie Z. | 4% | 33% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | NAM Cassie | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | DO Leila | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | LEE Ji Ahn | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Eunice | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | YEH Marissa E. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 45 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | LI Shuang | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | FUNG Vera | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CABALU Alaina | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | ZHENG Zoe | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LUO Sandra J. | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 52 | KUMAR Anmol | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | HOBSON Ava | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | NICKOLOV Nora | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | WANG Celine S. | 18% | 49% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.