Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Cheryl | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 2 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 3 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 3 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% |
| 5 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% |
| 6 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | LUU Shanon K. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 8 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 9 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
| 10 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 11 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 12 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 13 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 14 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 18 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 20 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 22 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 23 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 24 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 26 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
| 29 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 6% |
| 30 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 5% |
| 31 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% |
| 34 | YU Seneca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 8% |
| 35 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 36 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 37 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 38 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 96% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | NAM Cassie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 41 | DO Leila | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 45 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | LI Shuang | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 52 | KUMAR Anmol | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 82% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.