Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JINICH Ilan R. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
2 | REYES Xavier M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
3 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
3 | KOTOV Leonid | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
5 | WU MENGKE | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% | |
6 | JIANG Anthony | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
7 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
8 | CHANG Colin S. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 40% | 9% | ||
9 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
10 | BULL Anderson | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
11 | HOLZ William A. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
12 | COVINGTON Max G. | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | |
13 | BERGER Oliver | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% | ||
14 | LIN Daniel | 2% | 16% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
15 | SCHERER Max | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
16 | HOLZ Daniel | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 6% |
17 | LIM William J. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
18 | LIU Christopher X. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
19 | LEITH Jack | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
20 | SWORDS Evan F. | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
21 | WONG James T. | 10% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
22 | RAJAN Advait | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 4% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | - | ||
25 | VO Minh Q. | 2% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | XU Andrew | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | |
27 | BREIER Satchel E. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 35% | |
28 | YANG Dylan | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
30 | KROON Lucas | 15% | 43% | 34% | 8% | - | ||
31 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 6% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
32 | CAISSE Simon B. | 29% | 47% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | REED Samuel J. | - | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
34 | RHEE Ethan N. | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
35 | KRASTEV Mihail | 15% | 42% | 34% | 9% | - | ||
36 | YEARLING Ethan | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | RAMANAN Govind | 1% | 30% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
38 | ZHANG Yankun | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
39 | THORNLEY Jalen C. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
40 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 33% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | CHANG LAWRENCE | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
42 | WOO Brian | 27% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
43 | TUNG Ryan | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.