Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JINICH Ilan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 13% |
2 | REYES Xavier M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% |
3 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
3 | KOTOV Leonid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
5 | WU MENGKE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 18% | |
6 | JIANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
7 | WANG Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
8 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 9% | ||
9 | STONE Esmond A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
10 | BULL Anderson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
11 | HOLZ William A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
12 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
13 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | ||
14 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
15 | SCHERER Max | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
16 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 6% |
17 | LIM William J. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
18 | LIU Christopher X. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
19 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 5% | |
20 | SWORDS Evan F. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
21 | WONG James T. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
22 | RAJAN Advait | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | SOUTHWORTH Nathaniel | 100% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | ||
25 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | XU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
27 | BREIER Satchel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | |
28 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
30 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 85% | 42% | 8% | - | ||
31 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
32 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 71% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
33 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 100% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
34 | RHEE Ethan N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
35 | KRASTEV Mihail | 100% | 85% | 43% | 9% | - | ||
36 | YEARLING Ethan | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 99% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | |
38 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
39 | THORNLEY Jalen C. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
40 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
41 | CHANG LAWRENCE | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
42 | WOO Brian | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
43 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.