Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PETROVA Kristina | - | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
| 2 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
| 3 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 3 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 13% | |
| 5 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 6 | JO Mia C. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 7 | SHIH Diane | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | KIM Katherine | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 9 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 10 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
| 11 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 42% | 12% |
| 12 | YU Seneca | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
| 13 | YEH Marissa E. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 2% |
| 15 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 16 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 17 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 18 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 19 | HWANG Alison | 1% | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 21 | CHEN Chloe I. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | HSIUNG Samantha | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 23 | PENG Serena | 3% | 37% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | KONG Olivia | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 25 | KOROL Dana | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
| 26 | PRIETO Sofia M. | - | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 27 | DUAN Konnie | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 28 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 29 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | KANG Jiyoon | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 31 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 16% | |
| 32 | OTEYZA Camille | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | TAN Clarisse | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | PANT Anisha | - | 5% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | WANG Zoie Z. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SUN Emily | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | LUU Shanon K. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 3% |
| 39 | LEE Allison | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HOBSON Ava | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | PATTERSON Natalia | 35% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | LEE Ji Ahn | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | DO Leila | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | ZHENG Zoe | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | CABALU Alaina | 39% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | NAM Cassie | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | ENRILE Erica | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | KUMAR Anmol | 11% | 50% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | PARK Leah | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LUH Mia P. | 20% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LUO Annabella | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.