Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PETROVA Kristina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 2 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 3 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 3 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 13% | |
| 5 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
| 6 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 7 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 4% |
| 8 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 9 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% |
| 10 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
| 11 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 12% |
| 12 | YU Seneca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 13 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
| 14 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 2% |
| 15 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | |
| 16 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 17 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 18 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
| 19 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 20 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 21 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 22 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | PENG Serena | 100% | 97% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 13% | |
| 25 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | |
| 26 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 28 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 29 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 31 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 16% | |
| 32 | OTEYZA Camille | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | TAN Clarisse | 100% | 99% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 3% | |
| 35 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 36 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SUN Emily | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | LUU Shanon K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 31% | 3% |
| 39 | LEE Allison | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 65% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | DO Leila | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 61% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | NAM Cassie | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | KUMAR Anmol | 100% | 89% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | PARK Leah | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LUO Annabella | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.