Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | - | 6% | 40% | 54% | |
| 2 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 56% | 27% | |
| 3 | JUNG Irene | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 3 | YANG Lea | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 6 | XU Ellen | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 7 | CHANG Audrey | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 37% | 6% |
| 8 | WANG Zidan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | CHIN Elise | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 10 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | DAVIS Jayna M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 12 | TONG Jessie | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
| 13 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 14 | TSOI Julie | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 15 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 16 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | TUNG Renee | 4% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 18 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 9% | 37% | 38% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 20 | HU Michelle | 1% | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | LIN Lauren | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | GOMES Diana C. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 23 | REGANTI Sitara | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | HUANG MADELINE | - | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 25 | LO Chloe | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | CHO Michelle | 23% | 47% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | BARTON Mele | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Lauren | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 30 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 34% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | SOWERS Lia | 4% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | NEELEY Leilani | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 26% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | YAO Rainie | 36% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | KIM Elyssa | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | LIN Grace | 24% | 51% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | SAAD Alia | 9% | 34% | 41% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | WANG Jasmine | 54% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | OLKO Sophie | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.