Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 54% | |
| 2 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 27% | |
| 3 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
| 3 | YANG Lea | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 5 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 6 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 7 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 6% |
| 8 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | CHIN Elise | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 10 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 11 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 12 | TONG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 13 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 14 | TSOI Julie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 15 | BARNOVITZ Maya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
| 16 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 18 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 100% | 91% | 54% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 20 | HU Michelle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 21 | LIN Lauren | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 22 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
| 23 | REGANTI Sitara | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 24 | HUANG MADELINE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
| 25 | LO Chloe | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 77% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | BARTON Mele | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | LEE Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 30 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | SOWERS Lia | 100% | 96% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | NEELEY Leilani | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 33 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 74% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | KIM Elyssa | 100% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 100% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | LIN Grace | 100% | 76% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | SAAD Alia | 100% | 91% | 58% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | OLKO Sophie | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.