Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG Eric Y. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 2 | GHAYALOD ansh | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | JIANG Anthony | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | AVAKIAN Alec | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 5 | SWORDS Evan F. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 5 | WU MENGKE | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | XU Andrew | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | KIM Andrew H. | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | QIU Nathan | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | COOK Cole | V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 11 | LIN Daniel | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | LO Konnor | V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 13 | LIM William J. | D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 14 | SCHERER Max | V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | NIETO Titus P. | V D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 16 | CHOW William T. | D D D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 17 | PATIL Aaryan A. | V V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 18 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | V V D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 19 | KUMAR Sachit | V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 20 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | D V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | V V D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 22 | KIM Ryan | D D V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | YANG Dylan | V D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | LO Andrew T. | D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 25 | CAISSE Simon B. | D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | CHAN Aidan | D D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 26 | LEE Noah | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 28 | KROON Lucas | D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 29 | BYON Julian | V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | RAJAN Advait | V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 31 | WOO Brian | D D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | GUO Ethan | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 33 | BYON Adrian | D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | PATRICO Peter | D V D V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 35 | RAMANAN Govind | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | TUNG Ryan | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 37 | SOWERS Samuel | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 38 | KIM Evan | D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 39 | ZHANG Yankun | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 40 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 41 | GAINES Isaac M. | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 42 | CASSIM Shayan | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 43 | JOHNSON Kai | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.