Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Eric Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% | |
| 2 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% | |
| 3 | JIANG Anthony | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 3 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 5 | SWORDS Evan F. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 5 | WU MENGKE | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% | |
| 7 | XU Andrew | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 45% | 11% | |
| 8 | KIM Andrew H. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 9 | QIU Nathan | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 10 | COOK Cole | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 11 | LIN Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 12 | LO Konnor | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 13 | LIM William J. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 14 | SCHERER Max | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 9% | |
| 15 | NIETO Titus P. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | CHOW William T. | - | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 18 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 28% | 3% | |
| 19 | KUMAR Sachit | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 20 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | KIM Ryan | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | YANG Dylan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | LO Andrew T. | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | CAISSE Simon B. | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | CHAN Aidan | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | LEE Noah | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 28 | KROON Lucas | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | BYON Julian | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | RAJAN Advait | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | WOO Brian | 31% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | GUO Ethan | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | BYON Adrian | 12% | 39% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | PATRICO Peter | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 35 | RAMANAN Govind | 6% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | TUNG Ryan | 14% | 52% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | SOWERS Samuel | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | KIM Evan | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | ZHANG Yankun | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | GAINES Isaac M. | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | CASSIM Shayan | 16% | 44% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | JOHNSON Kai | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.