Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 18% | 1% | |
| 2 | SONG Lawrence (Larry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | |
| 3 | SHIH William | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
| 3 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% | |
| 5 | GRANT Lachlan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 19% | |
| 6 | NAGIMOV Marsel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
| 7 | FERNANDES Zain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 8 | CHOI Ethan L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 9 | ADAMS Luke C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 10 | BESSIRE Nolan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 11 | CHEN Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 12 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 13 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | |
| 14 | MAO Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 15 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% | 1% |
| 16 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 17 | SOHN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 18% |
| 18 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 16% |
| 19 | DAVIS Christopher M. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | CARTER Lucas M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 23 | KONG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% | 2% |
| 24 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 98% | 79% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | |
| 26 | ZHANG Vincent | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% | |
| 28 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 29 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 30 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 33 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 6% | |
| 34 | FARQUHARSON Cole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 42% | 7% | |
| 35 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 100% | 83% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% | |
| 38 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 15% | 1% | |
| 40 | VILLASENOR Aidan | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | PATINO Yahir | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 100% | 98% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HALL Harper | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 45 | HO Justin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 46 | SOMERS Sean | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 59% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 49 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 74% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | LAI Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 51 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 53 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 92% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
| 54 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | ELLIS Preston Y. | 100% | 63% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | TAMHANKAR Neil | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.